Collaborate – and Innovate – or Else!

Collaboration and innovation are essential pillars of Vested Outsourcing; they are more than just lip service and group hugs, however.

Collaboration  requires attitudes, strategies and structures that encourage and reward effective innovation. By the same token innovation requires a high degree of innovative collaboration.

Some recent posts from the Horses for Sources blog/website underscore this necessity by showing the difficulty of achieving innovation in the BPO world. Horses for Sources, which I referenced last month in a post about George Kimball’s Outsourcing Agreements: A Practical Guide and its message of “mutual success through collaboration,” is a multi-disciplinary group of analysts and experts specializing in Business Process Outsourcing, Industry Specific Process Outsourcing and IT Outsourcing. CEO Phil Fersht founded the Horse for Sources blog in 2007.

Last month his site began delving into BPO innovation in theory and practice. One view from a commenter said BPO innovation “is more of a must-have cliché that features prominently in corporate presentations and RFP prefaces rather than as a delivered reality which significantly impacts business performance.” That’s because “neither the client nor the service provider really wants it,” the commenter continued. The commenter’s point is that innovation is great so long as someone else is paying for it and so long as the gain is painless.

Fersht says that while this viewpoint represents many of the realities of today’s innovation issues, there’s new data that reflects an “increasing onus” on BPO leaders to find and deliver new, creative ways to find value. In that regard gainsharing is often cited as an innovative way to provide value, but as Fersht says, gainsharing “ain’t the cure it’s cracked up to be because: a. The gain is often difficult to identify and measure in terms of realized business value, or b. The outcome of the innovation often does not result in a tangible business gain.”

In Vested Outsourcing, I describe gainsharing as a concept that shares cost savings; typically it is based on productivity measures and on reduced service costs for a specified range of activities. The Vested Outsourcing approach is much broader and holistic than gainsharing alone because it incorporates not only the cost reduction concepts of gainsharing, but also revenue increases, benefits derived from service improvements, inventory reductions, process improvements, and so on.

As Fersht puts it the real-life implications of the three C’s of innovation: collaboration, co-investment and change management need to be fully understood. Failure to understand, implement and achieve innovation puts the BPO in “purgatory,” he says, because expectations are not met.

He continues: A survey of 588 shared services and outsourcing executives, studying the current achievements of innovation within BPO, “serves up a major dose of realism to the global sourcing industry: Buyers want it, but they are not working effectively with their providers to achieve it. And many buyers and providers are pointing the finger at each other.”

The survey, entitled “Are you Achieving Innovation in BPO?” was conducted last month by HfS Research in conjunction with the Shared Services and Outsourcing Network’s (SSON) network of senior finance and operations executives.

Innovation is becoming an important, even critical component for BPO, especially in a fragile, supposedly recovering and gun-shy economy adjusting to whatever new normal is out there.

The survey looked at 134 buyers withsignificant influence’ over BPO decisions and found that 94 percent of them consider achieving innovation as critically (43 percent) or quite important (54 percent). But BPO buyers and BPO service providers “are equally disappointed with each others’ provision of resources and technology to meet their expectations of achieving innovation.” HfS found that 41 percent of service providers and 41 percent of BPO buyers are “somewhat disappointed” with the accomplishment of innovation expectations.

This translates into a “major concern for the future of BPO services.”

In the study, ‘innovation in BPO’ was defined as the “customer going beyond transactional/operational work to achieve new productivity gains and/or new revenue streams by implementing new practices through unique creative methods.”

Speaking of creative, innovative and beyond the transaction, Vested Outsourcing’s Five Rules stress that innovation requires the parties to work together to achieve mutually measurable and beneficial outcomes through collaborative planning, innovative goals and milestones over time, with service levels that are outcome and not transaction-based.

One key is that for innovation to take off, collaborative pricing and performance measurement models must mature. Rules 3 and 4 are especially pertinent here: Agree on clearly defined and measurable outcomes (Rule 3); and Optimize pricing model incentives for cost/service trade-offs (Rule 4).

Simply put, Vested Outsourcing pays companies to use their brains and technology rather than brawn (i.e., counting transactions or simply filling a seat more cheaply) to grow and innovate, as the economist Robert Solow tells us.

It’s not magic or alchemy: For innovation to occur there has to be a collaborative ecosystem that encourages innovation and then sets it in motion.

Comments

  1. From the BPO services the corporate world specially the the IT companies generate massive revenue.

Speak Your Mind

*