• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Vested

Based on research with…

HASLAM College of Business. The university of Tennessee, Knoxville
  • Home
  • What Is Vested?
    • Vested FAQ’s
    • The Story of the Vested Movement
    • About the Vested Faculty
  • Books
  • Blog
  • Speaking
  • Resources
    • Books
    • Vested Courses
    • Vested White Paper and Case Study Library
    • Workshops
    • Assessments
    • Vested Toolkit
    • Vested Certified Deal Architects
    • Vested Centers of Excellence Coaching and Consulting
  • Toolkit
  • Courses
    • Overview of Vested Courses
    • Online Courses
    • On Site Courses
    • Certified Deal Architect Program
    • Courseware FAQ
  • Login

Outsourcing T&Cs Can Cost You!

June 16, 2011 by Kate Vitasek

The old adage about being careful what you ask for applies to contract terms and conditions in spades: you may think you are properly protecting an outsourcing arrangement and insulating it from risk, but the flip side is that numerous T&Cs mean more costs that eat away at profits.

Copious, onerous and (often) unnecessary T&Cs not only can hit the bottom line, they can contribute to a failed outsourcing deal, especially if they are one-sided and inhibit innovation and trust.

Oliver Kirchner, Senior Legal Counsel, Global Commercial Transactions for Nokia Siemens Networks, illustrated this point last month in a presentation on “Why Outsourcing Deals Turn Sour“ at the Arab Outsourcing Conference.

Outsourcing projects can sour when the various reasons for outsourcing in the first place become blurred by self-interest and a failure to collaborate, or as Oliver says, when the expectations of one of the parties are not met.

Rigid T&Cs reached in a vacuum can’t align expectations between the parties. In a Vested Outsourcing partnership they can because they exist only after the parties’ collaborative efforts on a joint statement of intent to achieve their Desired Outcomes.

Oliver’s chart shows that T&Cs are not just a legal issue. As base costs (including calculable risks) and costs involved with additional requirements (such as estimated risks) mount up the final pricing structure eats away at profit.

Get Your Free Copy of THE VESTED WAY

 

 

Outsourcing practitioners remain stuck in old-school, and I believe, outdated contract principles designed to shift risk, limit liability and focus primarily on price instead of value as the main priority of contract terms. Oliver points this out in his presentation, and The Vested Outsourcing Manual, which will be published by Palgrave Macmillan later this month, also addresses this unfortunate reality, based on research by IACCM.

Rather than contract terms that start with pricing, price protections, indemnification and payment, why not collaborate on terms that begin with scope and goals, change management, and communication before worrying about price?

That’s the outcome-based Vested approach that produces value through the true collaborative win-win.

It is also what Oliver said last month: “Only a win-win deal is a good outsourcing deal.”

Related posts:

  • Achieving Value through Contract Terms: It is Possible
  • Lawyers: Can’t Live with Them, Can’t Live without Them?
  • Balancing the Outsource Contract Scales
  • Two Years On: Happy Birthday Vested!

Filed Under: From the Blog Tagged With: collaboration, contract terms, IACCM, vested outsourcing, win-win

Vested 411

  • What is Vested
  • Vested FAQ's
  • Vested Faculty

Support

  • Technical Support

Join the Movement

  • Courses
  • Books
  • Speaking

Resources

  • Assessments
  • Books
  • Case Studies
  • White Papers
  • Toolkit
  • Centers of Excellence

Media

  • Contact

Privacy Policy

  • Privacy Policy
11410 NE 124th St. #311 Kirkland, WA 98034
Ph 762-475-8378
[email protected]
Vested

© 2025 Vested Outsourcing Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Contact Kate to Book
  • About You

  • About Your Event

  • MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • Additional Information